What is the typical width of a shared path?

Study for the PE Civil Transportation Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each question is detailed with hints and explanations. Ensure success with our study tools!

Multiple Choice

What is the typical width of a shared path?

Explanation:
The typical width of a shared path is indeed 10-14 ft. This width is designed to accommodate a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, and sometimes even equestrians, ensuring safe and efficient movement. Wider paths allow for safe passing, reduce the likelihood of collisions, and enable simultaneous use, which is particularly important in areas with high traffic or a mix of user types. Design guidelines often suggest this width range to promote accessibility, comfort, and safety for all users. It's essential to consider the volume of users and the types of activities that will occur on the path when determining the appropriate width; the 10-14 ft range is seen as optimal for balancing capacity and safety. In contrast, narrower paths might not effectively support the diverse activities or volume of users seen in popular shared spaces, leading to congestion and increased risk of accidents. On the other end, excessively wide paths could lead to unnecessary construction costs and maintenance challenges. Thus, the 10-14 ft width creates a functional and practical design standard for shared paths.

The typical width of a shared path is indeed 10-14 ft. This width is designed to accommodate a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, and sometimes even equestrians, ensuring safe and efficient movement. Wider paths allow for safe passing, reduce the likelihood of collisions, and enable simultaneous use, which is particularly important in areas with high traffic or a mix of user types.

Design guidelines often suggest this width range to promote accessibility, comfort, and safety for all users. It's essential to consider the volume of users and the types of activities that will occur on the path when determining the appropriate width; the 10-14 ft range is seen as optimal for balancing capacity and safety.

In contrast, narrower paths might not effectively support the diverse activities or volume of users seen in popular shared spaces, leading to congestion and increased risk of accidents. On the other end, excessively wide paths could lead to unnecessary construction costs and maintenance challenges. Thus, the 10-14 ft width creates a functional and practical design standard for shared paths.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy